skip to main content
10.1145/2362499.2362502acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessemanticsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Scholarly publishing and linked data: describing roles, statuses, temporal and contextual extents

Published:05 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently, several ontologies have been introduced for semantic publishing. However, scholarly publishing, like other real-world domains, needs to be described also in terms of precise temporal durations and the particular contexts in which the relevant processes take place. For instance, a document changes status during its publication process, e.g., from "draft" to "submitted" to "under review" to "accepted for publication", and so on. Similarly, one's roles may change with time: one's affiliation with an academic institution or one's role as a journal editor are likely to change over time. Existing well-known ontologies used to describe individuals and bibliographic entities in the Linked Data are currently not able to model situations of temporary or context-dependent possession (e.g., the holding of a status or of a role). In this paper, we address this issue by introducing two ontologies for semantic publishing, the Publishing Roles Ontology and the Publishing Status Ontology, that define the roles of people and the statuses of documents in the scholarly publishing domain.

References

  1. Aranguren, M E., Antezana, E., Kuiper, M., Stevens, R. (2008). Ontology Design Patterns for bio-ontologies: a case study on the Cell Cycle Ontology. In BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 5): S1. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-S5-S1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H. (2007). Roles, an interdisciplinary perspective. Special Issue of the Journal of Applied Ontology, 2 (2): 81--207. ISSN: 1570--5838. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brickley, D., Miller, L. (2010). FOAF Vocabulary Specification 0.98. Namespace Document, 9 August 2010 - Marco Polo Edition. http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/15Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T., Stead, S., Stiff, M. (2011). Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. Version 5.0.4, November 2011. ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.4.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D'Arcus, B., Giasson, F. (2009). Bibliographic Ontology Specification. Specification Document, 4 November 2009. http://bibliontology.com/specificationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2010). DCMI Metadata Terms. DCMI Recommendation. http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Guarino, N., Welty, C. (2002). Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. In Communications of the ACM, 45 (2): 61--65. doi:10.1145/503124.503150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Harris, S., Seaborne, A. (2012). SPARQL 1.1 Query Language. W3C Working Draft, 05 January 2012. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-queryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayes, P., Welty, C. (2006). Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web. W3C Working Group Note, 12 April 2006. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hobbs, J. R., Pan, F. (2006). Time Ontology in OWL. W3C Working Draft, 27 September 2006. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Iannella, R. (2010). Representing vCard Objects in RDF. W3C Member Submission, 20 January 2010. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kozaki, K., Endo, S., Mizoguchi, R. (2008). Instance Management Problems in the Role Model of Hozo. In Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Trends in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 08). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Masolo, C., Vieu, L., Bottazzi, E., Catenacci, C., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N. (2004). Social Roles and their Descriptions. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2004). https://www.aaai.org/Papers/KR/2004/KR04-029.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Moller, K., Bechhofer, S., Heath, T. (2009). Semantic Web Conference Ontology. http://data.semanticweb.org/ns/swc/ontologyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Presutti, V., Gangemi, A. (2008). Content Ontology Design Patterns as practical building blocks for web ontologies. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87877-3_11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Serafini, L., Homola, M. (2011). Contextual Representation and Reasoning with Description Logics. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL2011). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-745/paper_30.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Shotton, D. (2009). Semantic Publishing: the coming revolution in scientific journal publishing. Learned Publishing, 22 (2): 85--94. doi:10.1087/2009202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Shotton, D., Portwin, K., Klyne, G., Miles, A. (2009). Adventures in Semantic Publishing: Exemplar Semantic Enhancements of a Research Article. PLoS Computational Biology, 5 (4): e1000361. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Varma, P. (2010). Project Documents Ontology. http://vocab.deri.ie/pdoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Welty, C. (2010). Context Slices: Representing Contexts in OWL. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Ontology Patterns (WOP 2010). http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-671/pat01.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scholarly publishing and linked data: describing roles, statuses, temporal and contextual extents

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      I-SEMANTICS '12: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems
      September 2012
      215 pages
      ISBN:9781450311120
      DOI:10.1145/2362499

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate40of182submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader